Re: Pending 9.4 patches

From: Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Pending 9.4 patches
Date: 2014-04-08 15:59:00
Message-ID: 53441CC4.5030804@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/7/14 2:59 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 04/05/2014 03:57 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
>> c07) Updatable security barrier views.
>> This needs a serious look by a committer.
> I've been exercising it via row security and it's been looking pretty
> solid. It isn't a huge or intrusive patch, and it's seen several rounds
> of discussion during its development and refinement. (Thanks Dean).

Same here, nothing but good feedback from testing. The updatable
security barrier views has been sitting in "Ready For Committer" since
late January. Unfortunately, I just learned that some of the people who
might commit in this area--Stephen Frost for example--thought there were
still major oustanding issues with that part.

I (and I think Craig too) been waiting for that to be picked up by a
committer, Stephen was waiting for me or Craig to fix unrelated bugs,
and that's where the CF process has been deadlocked on this one.

> A core bugfix with locking in security barrier views is required
> before the regression tests can be fixed up properly, for one thing.
> Tom also expressed concerns about how plan invalidation works, though
> it's not yet clear whether that was just miscommunication about how it
> works on my part or whether there's a concrete problem there.

This is similarly stuck. I'm not out of resources, there's just nothing
I can do here myself. For this to move forward, a committer needs to
pick up the security barrier views part. We also need a bug fix for the
issue that's breaking the regression tests. Once all that's done, RLS
on top of updateable security barrier views might be commitable. But
there's no way to tell for sure until those other two bits are sorted out.

> I'd really love to finish this off for 9.4, but other projects have to
> come first.

I have no other projects ahead of this for the remainder of this month.
I just can't figure out what to do next until there's a committer (or
committers, if someone else is going to take on the locking bug)
identified. I looked at the locking problem enough to know that one is
over my head.

--
Greg Smith greg(dot)smith(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com
Chief PostgreSQL Evangelist - http://crunchydatasolutions.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2014-04-08 15:59:24 Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
Previous Message Florian Pflug 2014-04-08 15:58:00 Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)