| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Christoph Zwerschke" <cito(at)online(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Finding the pqlib version |
| Date: | 2006-02-21 23:17:45 |
| Message-ID: | 5341.1140563865@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> As I said previously, pg_config really belongs together with
>> the include files and the link libraries.
> But what about things like pg_config --bindir, pg_config --version,
> pg_config --sharedir etc - they are definitly usable even if you're not
> developing C language server extensions, aren't they?
Yes. pg_config started as strictly support for add-on makefiles but
it's evolved into something more than that. I'd vote for just dropping
it into the base package.
(Memo to self: should probably rearrange the Red Hat RPMs likewise.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-02-22 12:44:26 | Re: Finding the pqlib version |
| Previous Message | Christoph Zwerschke | 2006-02-21 22:34:07 | Re: Finding the pqlib version |