| From: | "Inoue, Hiroshi" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] New parameter RollbackError to control rollback behavior on error |
| Date: | 2014-03-28 03:53:19 |
| Message-ID: | 5334F22F.1030004@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc |
(2014/03/27 20:55), Michael Paquier wrote:
> (Moving back this thread to pgsql-odbc, so keeping a maximum of message history)
As for the patch in the original post,
Is there any difference between rollback_on_error and
rollback_error_value except the naming?
The length of connection strings seem to be increased at least 3 bytes.
Is it right?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 7015 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan
http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2014-03-28 04:28:12 | Re: inherit support for foreign tables |
| Previous Message | David Johnston | 2014-03-28 03:16:13 | Re: History of WAL_LEVEL (archive vs hot_standby) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Inoue, Hiroshi | 2014-03-28 03:55:01 | Re: Installing ODBC |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-03-28 03:30:34 | Re: FW: ODBC 9.3.0210 not commiting, Discard ALL |