Re: High Level Committers Wanted

From: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
To: Jayadevan M <maymala(dot)jayadevan(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: High Level Committers Wanted
Date: 2014-03-19 13:55:51
Message-ID: 5329A1E7.2010301@squeakycode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 3/19/2014 12:33 AM, Jayadevan M wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net
> <mailto:andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>> wrote:
>
> On 3/14/2014 6:08 AM, Antman, Jason (CMG-Atlanta) wrote:
>
> I'm not a "high level committer", nor am I even a regular poster
> to this
> list.
>
> not saying this post is true, but... If I'm reading between the
> lines
> correctly, this could make for quite a striking headline in the tech
> news - "NSA dumps Oracle proprietary database in favor of
> PostgreSQL."
>
>
> No no. <puts on tin foil hat> bobJobS is from Oracle. They are
> tying to lure all the PG developers to a secret meeting ... where
> they will all disappear. Problem solved. :-)
>
> -Andy
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> <mailto:pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/__mailpref/pgsql-general
> <http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general>
>
> I love that theory. You have been watching too many thrillers. But which
> problem gets solved?

I dunno. I'm new at conspiracy theories :-). I hoped, by some stretch,
Oracle was feeling the heat of competition from PG ... and decided to
"solve" the problem. See?

-Andy

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-03-19 14:15:22 Re: High Level Committers Wanted
Previous Message Jayadevan M 2014-03-19 05:33:34 Re: High Level Committers Wanted