Re: Question: rebuilding frontend tools after libpgfeutils.a changes?

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question: rebuilding frontend tools after libpgfeutils.a changes?
Date: 2026-03-02 23:12:05
Message-ID: 532998DE-C1F3-441A-A3EB-9995566036A0@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Mar 2, 2026, at 22:56, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I am wondering whether it would be worth updating the relevant Makefiles so that changes to libpgfeutils.a properly trigger rebuilds of dependent frontend binaries.
>
> I'd vote no, because it would add a lot of usually-pointless cycles to
> normal rebuild cases.
>
> Now, I'm a guy who doesn't believe in --enable-depend either, so
> your opinion might differ. But it would not be a free improvement.
>
> regards, tom lane

Thanks for the guidance. I will not spend time on that then.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zsolt Parragi 2026-03-02 23:19:22 Re: amcheck: add index-all-keys-match verification for B-Tree
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2026-03-02 23:11:17 Re: pg_plan_advice