Re: buildfarm + meson

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: buildfarm + meson
Date: 2023-03-09 20:25:00
Message-ID: 532474.1678393500@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2023-03-09 14:47:36 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> . There appears to be some mismatch in database names (e.g.
>> regression_dblink vs contrib_regression_dblink). That's going to cause some
>> issues with the module that adjusts things for cross version upgrade.

> I guess we can try to do something about that, but the make situation is
> overly complicated. I don't really want to emulate having randomly differing
> database names just because a test is in contrib/ rather than src/.

We could talk about adjusting the behavior on the make side instead,
perhaps, but something needs to be done there eventually.

Having said that, I'm not sure that the first meson-capable buildfarm
version needs to support cross-version-upgrade testing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-03-09 21:15:12 Re: allow_in_place_tablespaces vs. pg_basebackup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-03-09 20:21:36 Re: [PATCH] Add pretty-printed XML output option