| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Ondřej Bouda <obouda(at)email(dot)cz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: backend crash on DELETE, reproducible locally |
| Date: | 2018-11-06 22:11:40 |
| Message-ID: | 5323.1541542300@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2018-11-06 16:47:20 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looks like somebody forgot to list
>> RELOPT_KIND_GIST in RELOPT_KIND_INDEX, but is that the
>> fault of commit c203d6cf8 or was it busted before?
> Looks new:
> + RELOPT_KIND_INDEX = RELOPT_KIND_BTREE|RELOPT_KIND_HASH|RELOPT_KIND_GIN|RELOPT_KIND_SPGIST,
> there aren't any other "for all indexes" type options, so the whole
> category didn't exist before.
> It also strikes me as a really bad idea, even if RELOPT_KIND_GIST
> wouldn't have been omitted: It breaks index am extensibility.
Hm, well, that enum already knows about all index types, doesn't it?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-11-06 22:16:36 | Re: backend crash on DELETE, reproducible locally |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-11-06 22:11:29 | Re: backend crash on DELETE, reproducible locally |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-11-06 22:16:36 | Re: backend crash on DELETE, reproducible locally |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-11-06 22:11:29 | Re: backend crash on DELETE, reproducible locally |