Re: Replication slots and footguns

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication slots and footguns
Date: 2014-03-13 17:03:42
Message-ID: 5321E4EE.9040003@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/13/2014 04:07 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-03-12 13:34:47 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 03/12/2014 12:34 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>>> Urgh. That error message looks susceptible to improvement. How about:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> replication slot "%s" cannot be dropped because it is currently in use
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that'd require duplicating some code between acquire and drop,
>>>>> but how about "replication slot "%s" is in use by another backend"?
>>> Sold.
>>
>> Wait ... before you go further ... I object to dropping the word
>> "active" from the error message. The column is called "active", and
>> that's where a DBA should look; that word needs to stay in the error
>> message.
>
> "replication slot "%s" is in active in another backend"?

"*for* another backend", but that works for me. I just want to keep the
word "active", because when I encountered that error in testing I knew
*immediately* where to look because of the word.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-03-13 17:05:57 Re: Proposal to join the hackers list
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-03-13 17:01:10 Re: JSON Patch (RFC 6902) support?