Re: Need help understanding pg_locks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Need help understanding pg_locks
Date: 2011-07-13 15:44:36
Message-ID: 5321.1310571876@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> OK, I went with this wording, using "lock object is on" terminology.
> Applied patch attached --- adjustments welcomed.

I think you misunderstood the suggestion. This is not an improvement,
it's just more confusion.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-07-13 15:59:21 Re: Expression Pruning in postgress
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-07-13 15:41:50 Re: Need help understanding pg_locks