Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"
Date: 2014-03-12 03:52:47
Message-ID: 531FDA0F.5090407@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 03/11/2014 11:50 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> But not sure how to define a unique
>> index that allows (joe, db1) to coexist with (joe, db2) but not with
>> (joe, 0).
>>
> and why you want that restriction? when you login you need to specify
> the db, right? if you don't specify the db then is the global 'joe'
> that want to login
>

You can't login without specifying a db. Every session is connected to a db.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2014-03-12 04:05:41 Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2014-03-12 03:50:28 Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"