Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"
Date: 2014-03-12 00:46:02
Message-ID: 531FAE4A.6050600@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/11/2014 06:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mind you, I wouldn't be unhappy to see it go away; it's a kluge and always
> has been. I'm just expecting lots of push-back if we try. And it's kind
> of hard to resist push-back when you don't have a substitute to offer.

Yeah, what we really need is encapsulated per-DB users and local
superusers. I think every agrees that this is the goal, but nobody
wants to put in the work to implement a generalized solution.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-03-12 01:37:47 Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-03-11 23:57:05 Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"