Re: Fix a wrong comment in setrefs.c

On 03/11/2023 08:10, Richard Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:51 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 5:45 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> <mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>> wrote:
>
> I'm inclined to write the comment more like "Usually the equal()
> check is redundant, but in setop plans it may not be, since
> prepunion.c assigns ressortgroupref equal to the column resno
> without regard to whether that matches the topmost level's
> sortgrouprefs and without regard to whether any implicit coercions
> are added in the setop tree.  We might have to clean that up
> someday;
> but for now, just ignore any false matches."
>
>
> +1.  It explains the situation much more clearly and accurately.
>
> To make it easier to review, I've updated the patch to be so.

Committed, thanks!

--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)