From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? |
Date: | 2014-02-05 18:48:40 |
Message-ID: | 52F28788.5030405@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/5/14, 1:31 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> Perhaps this type should be called pglsn, since it's an
>> implementation-specific detail and not a universal concept like int,
>> point, or uuid.
>
> If we're going to do that, I suggest pg_lsn rather than pglsn. We
> already have pg_node_tree, so using underscores for separation would
> be more consistent.
Yes, that's a good precedent in multiple ways.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-02-05 18:49:00 | Re: [doc patch] extra_float_digits and casting from real to numeric |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-02-05 18:47:55 | Re: Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD |