Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived

From: "Albe Laurenz" <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "Tim Allen *EXTERN*" <tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Date: 2006-08-01 08:38:24
Message-ID: 52EF20B2E3209443BC37736D00C3C13809B5B64C@EXADV1.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tim Allen wrote:
>>>Patch included to implement xlog switching, using an xlog record
>>>"processing instruction" and forcibly moving xlog pointers.
>>>
>>>1. Happens automatically on pg_stop_backup()
>>
>>
>> Oh - so it will not be possible to do an online backup
>> _without_ forcing a WAL switch any more?
>
> Well, previously, you would have always had to simulate a wal
> switch, by
> working out which is the current wal file and copying that. Otherwise
> your online backup wouldn't be complete.
>
> What Simon is describing sounds like a big step forward from that
> situation. It should let me delete half the code in my pitr
> backup/failover scripts. Definitely a Good Thing.

Certainly a Good Thing, and it should be on by default.

But couldn't there be situations where you'd like to do an
online backup without a WAL switch? To avoid generating an
archive WAL every day on a database with few changes, e.g.?

Maybe not, I'm just wondering.

Laurenz Albe

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2006-08-01 08:48:20 Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Previous Message Tim Allen 2006-08-01 08:27:50 Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2006-08-01 08:48:20 Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Previous Message Tim Allen 2006-08-01 08:27:50 Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived