> > Was there ever a decision in "the libcurl thread"?
> No, not yet.
> Personally I'm unconvinced that we should depend on libcurl: if it's
> going to use openldap to do LDAP work, then the only good
> reason to use libcurl rather than openldap directly is if there's some
> clear use-case for libcurl's other features. Which no one had
presented AFAIR. I'm
> still willing to be convinced though.
I'm almost done with implementing a patch that recognizes LDAP URLs in
pg_services.conf and queries an LDAP server for a connection option
Currently I'm coding against libldap, and I intend to submit the patch
that way. If there are loud calls for another library, I think I could
adapt the code without much hassle.
The only other protocol I can think of that might make sense is
HTTP, but I personally have never heard of a web server employed
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2006-03-06 08:30:45|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LDAP auth |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-03-06 05:14:00|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Zeroing damaged pages|