Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?
Date: 2014-01-23 21:03:55
Message-ID: 52E183BB.5050306@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24/01/14 09:49, Tom Lane wrote:
> 2. What have you got that is requesting exclusive lock on
> pg_attribute? That seems like a pretty unfriendly behavior in itself.
> regards, tom lane

I've seen this sort of problem where every db session was busily
creating temporary tables. I never got to the find *why* they needed to
make so many, but it seemed like a bad idea.

Regards

Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-01-23 21:04:10 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.1
Previous Message Harold Giménez 2014-01-23 21:00:20 Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?