Re: proposal: hide application_name from other users

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Harold Giménez <harold(at)heroku(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: proposal: hide application_name from other users
Date: 2014-01-22 17:47:05
Message-ID: 52E00419.6060101@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/21/2014 05:21 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think the only realistic thing is a "monitoring" capability, like we
> have "replication". GRANT/REVOKE doesn't even come close to being able
> to generically allow to grant permissions of even the moderate
> complexity pg_stat_get_activity() has.

That would work for me, personally. I don't know how it would work for
anyone else.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-01-22 17:49:21 Re: new json funcs
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2014-01-22 17:44:35 Re: pgsql: Compress GIN posting lists, for smaller index size.