Re: array_length(anyarray)

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostGreSql hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: array_length(anyarray)
Date: 2014-01-10 00:36:33
Message-ID: 52CF4091.8030305@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/10/14, 1:20 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> I'm piling on: it's not clear at all to me why you've special cased
> this to lower_bound=1. First of all, there are other reasons to check
> length than iteration.

Can you point me to some examples?

> the server API function should implement as many
> reasonable behaviors as possible.

That's exactly what I've done here. :-)

Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2014-01-10 00:59:20 Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2014-01-10 00:20:34 Re: array_length(anyarray)