Re: ISN extension bug? (with patch)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ISN extension bug? (with patch)
Date: 2014-01-03 15:27:50
Message-ID: 52C6D6F6.8030702@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/24/13, 10:29 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
>> On 12/22/13, 2:36 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>> I'm not sure whether the policy is to update the version number of the
>>> extension for such a change. As the library is always "isn.so", two
>>> versions cannot live in parallel anyway. If it is useful, the second
>>> patch attached also upgrade the version number.
>>
>> If you are not changing anything in the SQL, then you don't need to
>> change the version number.
>
> Ok, thanks for the information. I understand that the version number is
> about the API, not the implementation.
>
> If so, there is only the one-liner patch to consider.

This patch doesn't apply anymore. Please submit an updated patch for
the commit fest.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-01-03 15:31:01 Re: [bug fix] "pg_ctl stop" times out when it should respond quickly
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-01-03 15:20:12 Re: RFC: Async query processing