From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Reiser, John J(dot)" <Reiser(at)rowan(dot)edu>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: duplicate OID issue when using pg_upgrade to move from 8.4 to 9.2 |
Date: | 2014-01-01 21:00:11 |
Message-ID: | 52C481DB.4060909@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 01/01/2014 12:45 PM, Reiser, John J. wrote:
>
> On 1/1/14, 3:37 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>>
>> Could you look at the text surrounding these places to determine which
>> types this OID is being selected for? Each of these calls should be just
>> preceding a CREATE TYPE command (with maybe a set_next_array_pg_type_oid
>> call between) that is supposed to use the specified OID for its type.
>> Also identify which databases the commands are being issued in, by looking
>> back for the most recent \connect command.
>>
>> Also, is there any CREATE TYPE for st_envelope preceding the failing
>> CREATE FUNCTION command (in the same database)?
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>
> Tom,
>
> Thanks for the info. After searching the output for the connection string,
> I found that it's failing on a database that can be archived. I think I'll
> get what I need from the database, drop it, then perform the upgrade.
Well I think Tom was looking for that information to not only solve your
issue but also to determine whether this is a bug that needs to be
fixed. So providing that information would help the greater cause if it
is something you can do.
>
> Thank you again for all of your help. It's greatly appreciated!
>
> John
>
>
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2014-01-01 21:02:29 | Re: question on IPC vs TCPIP |
Previous Message | Andrew McIntyre | 2014-01-01 20:55:50 | question on IPC vs TCPIP |