From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? |
Date: | 2013-12-10 00:53:49 |
Message-ID: | 52A6661D.7010008@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/06/2013 03:02 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Heck, I'd be happy just to have a class of messages which specifically
> means "OMG, there's something wrong with the server", that is, a flag
> for messages which only occur when PostgreSQL encounters a bug, data
> corrpution, or platform error. Right now, I have to suss those out by
> regex.
+10
That's what I really need to see in the logs, too.
Using SQLState might be reasonable, but I'd be concerned we'd find cases
where the same standard-specififed SQLState should be sent to the
*client*, despite different underlying causes for the server of
different levels of DBA concern.
I'd rather not suppress logging of user-level errors, etc; they're
important too. It's just necessary to be able to separate them from
internal errors that should never happen when the system is operating
correctly in order to do effective log-based alerting.
After all, I *don't* want to get an SMS whenever the deadlock detector
kicks in and someone's created a database in de_DE so the string pattern
match doesn't kick in.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-10 00:53:56 | Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2013-12-10 00:53:19 | Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good |