Re: "openssl" should not be optional

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "openssl" should not be optional
Date: 2025-09-24 11:22:28
Message-ID: 52A12672-72CC-47FC-A0FA-DDFF7C23F2D2@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 24 Sep 2025, at 13:14, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:

> While it is probably possible to skip the tests when the configure
> probe did not find the openssl binary, IMHO the configure check should
> already fail. That's more robust and easier.

It seems a bit restrictive to require the openssl binary which is test-only,
since we allow building with ssl but without TAP support (which is where the
openssl binary is used).

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2025-09-24 11:31:22 RE: Newly created replication slot may be invalidated by checkpoint
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-09-24 11:20:55 Re: Newly created replication slot may be invalidated by checkpoint