| From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Full Stored Procedure Support, any time soon ? |
| Date: | 2013-11-30 22:47:06 |
| Message-ID: | 529A6AEA.90900@hogranch.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11/30/2013 2:30 PM, Noel Diaz wrote:
> This might involve the control of transaction state and the return
> of multiple result sets
>
> * PL/pgSQL stored procedure returning multiple result sets
> (SELECTs)?
> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-10/msg00454.php>
> * Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg01375.php>
> * http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg00542.php
> * Gathering specs and discussion on feature (post 9.1)
> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg01149.php>
>
> Does anybody know if any the committers are working on that list?
I don't think the libpq API will allow that first one, a SQL query can
only return a single recordset of rows that all have the same fields.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-11-30 23:21:08 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| Previous Message | Noel Diaz | 2013-11-30 22:30:59 | Re: Full Stored Procedure Support, any time soon ? |