Re: better atomics - v0.2

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: better atomics - v0.2
Date: 2013-11-19 15:13:33
Message-ID: 528B801D.5010609@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/19/13, 9:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm. Now that I think about it, isn't Peter proposing to break systems
> without working "inline" over here?
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1384257026.8059.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net

No, that's about const, volatile, #, and memcmp.

I don't have an informed opinion about requiring inline support
(although it would surely be nice).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message J Smith 2013-11-19 15:16:29 Re: Errors on missing pg_subtrans/ files with 9.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-11-19 15:10:33 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol