Re: Call flow of btinsert(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Rohit Goyal <rhtgyl(dot)87(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call flow of btinsert(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Date: 2013-11-19 12:58:41
Message-ID: 528B6081.8030909@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/19/2013 08:11 PM, Rohit Goyal wrote:
>
> Also what I understood from your reply is that everything is abstracted,
> so am doesnot care abt backend implementation. Now, I want to modify B
> tree indexing scheme. So, which files I should focus ?

Depends on whether you can do what you want without modifying the index
access method. You still haven't explained what you are trying to
achieve, what your goal is.

I don't think this conversation is productive. There's plenty of
existing documentation to review to help you get started, and you can
find guides on how to use gdb everywhere across the Internet. The code
is full of comments.

If you had a detailed, specific question maybe someone here could help
you. Without that you're just going to have to start learning the
relevant code.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2013-11-19 13:09:48 Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2013-11-19 12:48:24 Re: Handling GIN incomplete splits