Re: additional json functionality

On 18/11/13 09:02, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>> It’s still input and output as JSON, though.
>> Yes, because JavaScript Object Notation *is* a serialization format
>> (aka Notation) for converting JavaScript Objects to text format
>> and back :)
>>> I still like JSONB best.
>> To me it feels redundant, like binarytextbinary
>>
>> the binary representation of JSON is JavaScript(-like) Object, not
>> "binary json"
>>
>> So my vote would be either jsobj or jsdoc (as "document databases") tend
>> to call the structured types "documents"
> You know that both types support scalar values right? 'a'::JSON works now, and 'a'::hstore works with the WIP patch. For that reason I would not think that "doc" or "obj" would be good choices.
>
> I like JSONB because:
>
> 1. The "B" means "binary"
> 2. The "B" means "second"
> 3. It's short
> 4. See also BYTEA.
>
> Best,
>
> David
>
>
>
>
Whatever, I think the first 4 characters have to 'JSON' - for easy
identification.

Cheers,
Gavin