| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
| Date: | 2013-11-15 18:55:29 |
| Message-ID: | 52866E21.9010603@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/14/13, 9:40 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find attached updated patches for the support of REINDEX
> CONCURRENTLY, renamed 2.0 for the occasion:
> - 20131114_1_index_drop_comments.patch, patch that updates some
> comments in index_drop. This updates only a couple of comments in
> index_drop but has not been committed yet. It should be IMO...
> - 20131114_2_WaitForOldsnapshots_refactor.patch, a refactoring patch
> providing a single API that can be used to wait for old snapshots
> - 20131114_3_reindex_concurrently.patch, providing the core feature.
> Patch 3 needs to have patch 2 applied first. Regression tests,
> isolation tests and documentation are included with the patch.
The third patch needs to be rebased, because of a conflict in index.c.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-11-15 19:00:00 | Re: Sequence Access Method WIP |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-11-15 18:48:09 | Re: Sequence Access Method WIP |