| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | noloader(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results |
| Date: | 2013-11-12 22:05:30 |
| Message-ID: | 5282A62A.5070400@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 11/11/13, 1:33 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> The analyzer is reporting some findings, and some of the findings look
> legitimate.
We have been tracking clang scan-build results for some time, and fixed
quite a few of them. Most of the remaining ones are false positives.
Maybe there are still a few that could be fixed, but certainly
scan-build is not suitable as an acceptance test of the PostgreSQL
source at this point.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-11-12 22:19:31 | Re: Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results |
| Previous Message | Johannes Björk | 2013-11-12 20:56:03 | Add COPY statement inside sql function AND/OR call function within function |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-11-12 22:14:00 | Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments |
| Previous Message | Nicolas Barbier | 2013-11-12 21:47:06 | Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments |