On 11/07/2013 02:27 PM, Jan Lentfer wrote:
>
> Btw, how hard would it be, to have pg_restore and now also pg_dump run
> with -j option do some ordering of work by size of e.g. the tables? E.g.
> if you run with -j4 it would make sense to start working on the largest
> tables (and it's indexes) first and continue by descending in t´size to
> keep all available "slots" filled as good as possible. Just at though.
>
Please start another thread on this - it's really completely separate
from the issue at hand. Hijacking threads like this is not a good idea.
cheers
andrew