Re: List of "binary-compatible" data types

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: List of "binary-compatible" data types
Date: 2013-11-05 18:00:15
Message-ID: 5279322F.706@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Noah,

>> Also, JSON <--> Text seems to be missing from the possible binary
>> conversions. That's a TODO, I suppose.
>
> Only json --> text, not json <-- text. Note that you can add the cast
> manually if you have an immediate need.

Huh? Why would text --> JSON require a physical rewrite? We have to
validate it, sure, but we don't need to rewrite it.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2013-11-05 18:08:28 Re: List of "binary-compatible" data types
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2013-11-05 17:58:11 Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments