Re: Add Information during standby recovery conflicts

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add Information during standby recovery conflicts
Date: 2020-11-30 17:59:15
Message-ID: 526ff0bc-612d-9083-5564-56e8219c1b8b@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/11/20 18:17, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/17/20 4:44 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for updating the patch! Here are review comments.
>>
>> +        Controls whether a log message is produced when the startup process
>> +        is waiting longer than <varname>deadlock_timeout</varname>
>> +        for recovery conflicts.
>>
>> But a log message can be produced also when the backend is waiting
>> for recovery conflict. Right? If yes, this description needs to be corrected.
>
> Thanks for looking at it!
>
> I don't think so, only the startup process should write those new log messages.
>
> What makes you think that would not be the case?

Probably my mis-underding of the patch did that. Sorry for noise..

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-11-30 18:04:07 Re: Add Information during standby recovery conflicts
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-11-30 17:57:09 Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze)