Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Date: 2013-10-10 18:24:10
Message-ID: 5256F0CA.30808@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> It also doesn't address my point that, if we are worst-case-scenario
> default-setting, we're going to end up with defaults which aren't
> materially different from the current defaults. In which case, why even
> bother with this whole exercise?

Oh, and let me reiterate: the way to optimize work_mem is through an
admission control mechanism.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-10-10 18:35:46 Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-10-10 18:21:24 Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions