Re: Horology regress test changed?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Horology regress test changed?
Date: 2000-11-07 06:53:03
Message-ID: 5246.973579983@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
>> I'm seeing a whole bunch of miscompares in the horology test today.
>> Is this stuff supposed to have changed behavior?

> Yup. RTFCVSL :)

I did, but the log didn't say anything about unfixed regression test
cases. If you're going to leave some platform-specific comparison
files un-updated, I think it'd be polite to warn people about that
explicitly... probably on pghackers, not just committers...

I have updated horology-no-DST-before-1970.out, but that still leaves
us needing updates for horology-1947-PDT.out and
horology-solaris-1947.out.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2000-11-07 08:52:47 Re: CVS problem
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-11-07 06:37:28 Re: Horology regress test changed?