Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes
Date: 2006-07-25 04:52:13
Message-ID: 5240.1153803133@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Do we add pgstatindex as a new contrib module,
> or merge it into contrib/pgstattuple?

I believe Alvaro was suggesting that you should add it as an additional
SQL function within contrib/pgstattuple. That'd be my advice too ---
I don't see a reason to break this out as a separate contrib module.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-25 04:55:48 Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-25 04:43:21 Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2006-07-25 08:20:37 Re: Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree
Previous Message Dhanaraj M 2006-07-25 04:15:59 [Fwd: Re: Patch for - Change LIMIT/OFFSET to use int8]