| From: | damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Timeline |
| Date: | 2013-09-19 19:42:16 |
| Message-ID: | 523B5398.7040809@dalibo.info |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Le 18/09/2013 18:14, Josh Berkus a écrit :
> Damien,
>
> This looks like fun!
>
> I'm not necessarily comfortable with an unqualified link from Ingres to
> Postgres; can you make it a dotted line or something? The reason I say
> this is that Stonebraker was quite firm that there was no code re-use
> from Ingres to Postgres, since he was legally prevented from such copying.
>
Yes you're right. I need to define different types of arrows... Or maybe
just remove Ingres out of the picture :)
> Link to my presentation Elephant Roads, which goes over a bunch of the
> commercial forks as of 2009:
>
> http://de.slideshare.net/pgconf/elephant-roads-a-tour-of-postgres-forks
>
Great presentation !
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2013-09-20 15:33:09 | MC Triangle PUG |
| Previous Message | Dan Ports | 2013-09-18 20:37:08 | Re: PostgreSQL Timeline |