Re: basic_archive lost archive_directory

From: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Олег Самойлов <splarv(at)ya(dot)ru>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: basic_archive lost archive_directory
Date: 2026-02-24 07:33:07
Message-ID: 5234821771918387@77e1e142-da70-4850-bfce-1a67e6fd1d40
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hello

Honestly, I don't think that only 8 stat calls per each 1Gbps of WAL writes is too much. I doubt basic_archive will be used in systems where there's a lot of writing. Although there is little benefit from this stat call, I agree.

> That said, if users are generally fine with the "could not create file" error,
> I'm ok with the proposed patch (i.e., just removing the check).

I'm ok with this error message.

regards, Sergei

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message José Antonio Morcillo Valenciano 2026-02-24 09:26:45 Re: BUG #19414: Wrong rows returned by index scan on HASH-partitioned table with PRIMARY KEY (PostgreSQL 16.9)
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2026-02-24 04:28:50 Re: basic_archive lost archive_directory