| From: | "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
| Date: | 2008-02-04 19:11:51 |
| Message-ID: | 52348.74.239.169.41.1202152311.squirrel@nuts.unixathome.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
On Mon, February 4, 2008 2:11 pm, Josh Berkus wrote:
> DVL,
>
>> Any respectable certification must be subjective. You don't look at the
>> person, think about it, and decide. There must be a subjective and
>> independent test. To do otherwise greatly reduces the value of the
>> certification.
>
> I think you mean "objective".
Yes, I do. Sorry.
> Anyway, this is all fairly academic until Josh & Co. have at least one
> certification exam at least halfway developed. At this point, I think
> we've collected enough opinions on -advocacy; maybe we should let the exam
> hackers do some work?
Yes, please. Those that what to work on this project should discuss it on
the cert list, not advocacy. Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-02-04 19:48:16 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Certification |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-02-04 19:11:11 | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | fkater@googlemail.com | 2008-02-04 19:12:51 | Alternative to tableoids? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-02-04 19:11:11 | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |