| From: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plpgsql.print_strict_params |
| Date: | 2013-09-14 01:55:40 |
| Message-ID: | 5233C21C.3030203@joh.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-09-14 03:33, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>> I thought about that, but it seemed more like a runtime option to
>> me. Any particular reason you think it would be better as a compile
>> time option?
>
> Seems like something that would be useful to change per function, rather
> than globally, no?
The way I see it, STRICT is like an assertion, and you *would* pretty
much always change it globally.
However, it would be useful to also have the option to set it for a
single function only. Will look into that. Thanks for the suggestion!
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-09-14 02:20:11 | Re: record identical operator |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-09-14 01:36:24 | Re: Re: Proposal/design feedback needed: WITHIN GROUP (sql standard ordered set aggregate functions) |