Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb

From: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)free(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb
Date: 2019-07-25 10:18:13
Message-ID: 5232061564049893@sas2-80c42a3bfdfe.qloud-c.yandex.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

>>>  I don't have a strong opinion here. If we change for >=, it'd be
>>>  better to also adapt vacuumdb for consistency. I didn't change it for
>>>  now, to stay consistent with vacuumdb.
>>
>>  Yep, no strong opinion from me too.
>
> My opinion tends towards consistency. Consistency sounds good.

Which one consistency you prefer? Currently we have just one >= FD_SETSIZE in pgbench and one > FD_SETSIZE -1 in vacuumdb. That's all.

regards, Sergei

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2019-07-25 10:37:08 Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-07-25 10:02:45 Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb