From: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: getting rid of maintainer-check |
Date: | 2013-09-10 20:51:58 |
Message-ID: | 522F866E.6080309@timbira.com.br |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03-09-2013 23:41, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The maintainer-check target never really caught on, I think. Most
> people don't run it, and that in turn annoys those who do. Also, it
> doesn't provide much functionality.
>
It has its use (before each release) but I agree that it isn't used
during minor version updates (because you need to update only one or two
po files).
> I propose that we get rid of it and roll the functionality into the
> regular build.
>
By 'regular build' you mean --enable-nls? If so, +1.
> - Running duplicate_oids during the regular build was already discussed
> elsewhere recently. There are some details to be resolved there, but
> it's doable.
>
This has been bashing sufficient developers along the years. +1.
> - Checking for tabs in SGML files can be run during the regular
> documentation build without problems.
>
This one too. +1.
--
Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2013-09-10 20:56:09 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install" |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-09-10 20:36:17 | Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal |