Re: Q about InsertIndexResult

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)stack(dot)net>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Q about InsertIndexResult
Date: 2003-02-12 17:15:45
Message-ID: 5222.1045070145@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)stack(dot)net> writes:
> One reason why existing interface is not good:
> Who say, that for one heap tuple should exists only one index tuple?

Good point. Is that reason enough to change it? Not sure. The index
AM doesn't really have to bother with telling the truth in the
InsertIndexResult it returns ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2003-02-12 17:54:12 Re: [HACKERS] Wrong charset mappings
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-02-12 17:01:48 Re: Options for growth