| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | pg_restore multiple --function options |
| Date: | 2013-08-26 19:29:06 |
| Message-ID: | 521BAC82.2000400@vmware.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
While looking at the pg_restore code, I noticed that while it supports
specifying multiple --table options to restore several tables, it does
not support multiple --function options. Or --index, --schema, or --trigger.
The support for multiple --table options was added in 9.3, in January.
See
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAK3UJRG+yV1mK5twLfKVMCwXH4f6PnJou6Rn=ecabyfQH1vVHg@mail.gmail.com.
Was there a particular reason for only doing it for --table, or was it
just an oversight or lack of interest? No doubt that --table is the most
interesting one, but IMHO the other options should behave the same, for
the sake of consistency.
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-08-26 19:30:51 | Re: pg_system_identifier() |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-08-26 19:20:54 | Re: Detail part for still waiting for lock log message |