| From: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context |
| Date: | 2013-08-23 08:36:28 |
| Message-ID: | 52171F0C.4060301@joh.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/23/13 8:38 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2013/8/22 Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
>> I like the idea, but I think this should be a new verbosity level. With
>> this patch you would have to go full VERBOSE just to debug PL/pgSQL code
>> with NOTICEs and DEBUGs in it, and that output then becomes harder to parse
>> with the useless C-code information.
>>
>
> do you prepare patch ?
I should have the time to produce one for the September commitfest, but
if you (or anyone else) want to work on this, I won't object.
My opinion at this very moment is that we should leave the the DEFAULT
verbosity alone and add a new one (call it COMPACT or such) with the
suppressed context for non-ERRORs.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2013-08-23 09:11:06 | Re: Does larger i/o size make sense? |
| Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-08-23 08:30:01 | Re: Does larger i/o size make sense? |