| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stěhule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass |
| Date: | 2014-04-08 14:50:35 |
| Message-ID: | 5212.1396968635@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Looks good, committed with a bit of further cleanup.
I had not actually paid attention to the non-regclass parts of this, and
now that I look, I've got to say that it seems borderline insane to have
chosen to implement regproc/regoper rather than regprocedure/regoperator.
The types implemented here are incapable of dealing with overloaded names,
which --- particularly in the operator case --- makes them close to
useless. I don't think this code was ready to commit.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-04-08 14:59:23 | Re: Proposal: COUNT(*) (and related) speedup |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-04-08 14:35:22 | Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) |