Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Billy G(dot) Allie" <Bill(dot)Allie(at)mug(dot)org>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch.
Date: 2002-11-07 04:38:28
Message-ID: 5211.1036643908@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am fine with this because it only touches unixware-specific stuff,
> except the change to Tom's inline function:
> [static] inline Datum
> myFunctionCall2(FmgrInfo *flinfo, Datum arg1, Datum arg2)
> Tom will have to comment on that.

That change would actively break some platforms (see C99 inline
specifications). Why is it necessary for SCO? We certainly have
plenty of other static inline functions ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-11-07 04:41:10 Re: 7.3b5 contrib compile problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-07 04:35:28 Re: Win32 port

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2002-11-07 05:27:31 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-07 04:03:18 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch.