| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: Win32 port |
| Date: | 2002-11-07 04:35:28 |
| Message-ID: | 5170.1036643728@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Whilst having a regular 4-6 month cycle (er... when was the last time
> THAT happened?) is alright, we should get the *Windows* native version
> out to the world ASAP.
We don't have a Windows native version, and it sounds like it'll be
awhile before we have an offered set of patches to review. I think
making any release schedule plans on the basis of (ahem) vaporware
patches is a bit foolhardy.
The "quick 7.4" plan was based on the assumption that PITR and Windows
patches would both be available almost immediately. If that doesn't
come to pass then I see no reason not to go with a normal-length
development cycle.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-07 04:38:28 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch. |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-11-07 04:35:14 | Re: 7.3b5 contrib compile problem |