Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message
Date: 2022-06-29 13:28:02
Message-ID: 520a503e-8c37-d09e-b887-22abed0c0be4@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Op 29-06-2022 om 15:00 schreef Amit Kapila:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> On 2022-06-26 Su 11:44, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>> JSON/SQL jsonpath
>>>
>>> For example, a jsonpath string with deliberate typo 'like_regexp'
>>> (instead of 'like_regex'):
>>>
>>> select js
>>> from (values (jsonb '{}')) as f(js)
>>> where js @? '$ ? (@ like_regexp "^xxx")';
>>>
>>> ERROR: syntax error, unexpected IDENT_P at or near " " of jsonpath input
>>> LINE 1: ...s from (values (jsonb '{}')) as f(js) where js @? '$ ? (@
>>> li...
>>>
>>> Both 'IDENT_P' and 'at or near " "' seem pretty useless.
>>>

> removing this. One thing that is not clear to me is why OP sees an
> acceptable message (ERROR: syntax error, unexpected invalid token at
> or near "=" of jsonpath input) for a similar query in 14?

To mention that was perhaps unwise of me because The IDENT_P (or more
generally, *_P) messages can be provoked on 14 too. I just thought
'invalid token' might be a better message because 'token' gives a more
direct association with 'errors during parsing' which I assume is the
case here.

IDENT_P or ANY_P convey exactly nothing.

Erik

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-06-29 13:30:41 Re: PostgreSQL 15 beta 2 release announcement draft
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-06-29 13:26:24 Re: Emit extra debug message when executing extension script.