Re: Failed assertion clauses != NIL

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Manuel Rigger <rigger(dot)manuel(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Failed assertion clauses != NIL
Date: 2019-11-19 13:45:54
Message-ID: 520C6E76-53A5-4EF2-A855-8054582221A5@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> On 19 Nov 2019, at 14:38, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:50:51PM +0100, Manuel Rigger wrote:
>>
>> when building PostgreSQL with -enable-cassert, executing the following
>> statements result in an assertion error:
>>
>> CREATE TABLE t0(c0 boolean, c1 boolean, c2 boolean);
>> INSERT INTO t0 VALUES(FALSE, FALSE, FALSE);
>> CREATE STATISTICS s0 ON c0, c2 FROM t0;
>> ANALYZE;
>> SELECT * FROM t0 WHERE t0.c2 OR t0.c1 OR t0.c0;
>
> Yes, I can reproduce it too. mcv_get_match_bitmap expects that
> stat_clauses will not be empty, but looks like in this situation
> stat_clauses is indeed NIL. clauselist_selectivity_simple right before
> actually doesn't insist on stat_clauses being non empty, probably it's
> just too strict assert.

I might be missing something, but if the clause list is NIL, wouldn't it better
to exit earlier from statext_mcv_clauselist_selectivity rather than relax the
Assertion since we will get a 1.0 estimate either way?

cheers ./daniel

--- a/src/backend/statistics/extended_stats.c
+++ b/src/backend/statistics/extended_stats.c
@@ -1267,6 +1267,9 @@ statext_mcv_clauselist_selectivity(PlannerInfo *root, List *clauses, int varReli
listidx++;
}

+ if (stat_clauses == NIL)
+ return 1.0;
+
/*
* First compute "simple" selectivity, i.e. without the extended
* statistics, and essentially assuming independence of the

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manuel Rigger 2019-11-19 14:31:43 No = operator for opfamily 426
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2019-11-19 13:38:39 Re: Failed assertion clauses != NIL