Re: [PATCH] Clarify that ssl_groups is for any key exchange groups

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Ewan Young <kdbase(dot)hack(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Si, Evan" <evsi(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify that ssl_groups is for any key exchange groups
Date: 2026-06-05 20:22:16
Message-ID: 51F54CD3-5791-40D5-984A-AA41BBEAE582@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 4 Jun 2026, at 05:00, Ewan Young <kdbase(dot)hack(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> v2 looks good to me, and I have nothing further.

I have applied the docs portion of this patch to master and REL_18_STABLE, but
given where we are in the release cycle I don't think the renames qualify as
fixes during a freeze. Please feel free to register this patch in the upcoming
commitfest to get the remaining portion into v20. You can add me as a reviewer
on that entry to make sure it stays on my radar.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tristan Partin 2026-06-05 20:34:01 Re: Prevent remote libpq notices from being sent to clients
Previous Message Mark Wong 2026-06-05 20:14:12 Re: updates for handling optional argument in system functions