Re: review: Non-recursive processing of AND/OR lists

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: review: Non-recursive processing of AND/OR lists
Date: 2013-07-17 16:30:28
Message-ID: 51E6C6A4.8020104@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/17/2013 05:21 AM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
>
>> I did a some performance tests of v5 and v6 version and there v5 is
>> little bit faster than v6, and v6 has significantly higher stddev
>>
>
> Thanks Pavel.
>
> The difference in average seems negligible, but stddev is interesting
> because v6 does less work than v5 in common cases and in the test that I
> had shared.
>
> The current commitfest (2013-06) is marked as 'In Progress', so is it okay
> to just mark the patch as 'Ready for Committer' or should I move it to the
> next commitfest (2013-09).

If this is actually "ready for committer", I'll mark it as such.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-07-17 16:46:08 Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-07-17 14:11:28 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY.